Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 23(1): 79, 2023 03 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2256861

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Our aim in this observational prospective study is to determine whether the prone position has an effect on intracranial pressure, by performing ultrasound-guided ONSD (Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter) measurements in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) ventilated in the prone position. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of ARDS who were placed in the prone position for 24 h during their treatment were included in the study. Standardized sedation and neuromuscular blockade were applied to all patients in the prone position. Mechanical ventilation settings were standardized. Demographic data and patients' pCO2, pO2, PaO2/FiO2, SpO2, right and left ONSD data, and complications were recorded at certain times over 24 h. RESULTS: The evaluation of 24-hour prone-position data of patients with ARDS showed no significant increase in ONSD. There was no significant difference in pCO2 values either. PaO2/FiO2 and pO2 values demonstrated significant cumulative increases at all times. Post-prone SPO2 values at the 8th hour and later were significantly higher when compared to baseline (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: As a result of this study, it appears that the prone position does not increase intracranial pressure during the first 24 h and can be safely utilized, given the administration of appropriate sedation, neuromuscular blockade, and mechanical ventilation strategy. ONSD measurements may increase the safety of monitoring in patients ventilated in the prone position.


Subject(s)
Intracranial Hypertension , Intracranial Pressure , Prone Position , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Intracranial Hypertension/diagnosis , Intracranial Hypertension/etiology , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Optic Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/complications , Ultrasonography
2.
BMJ Open ; 13(3): e071800, 2023 03 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2248219

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Studying cerebral autoregulation, particularly PRx (Pressure Reactivity Index), is commonly employed in adult traumatic brain injury (TBI) and gives real-time information about intracranial pathophysiology, which can help in patient management. Experience in paediatric TBI (PTBI) is limited to single-centre studies despite disproportionately higher incidence of morbidity and mortality in PTBI than in adult TBI. PROJECT: We describe the protocol to study cerebral autoregulation using PRx in PTBI. The project called Studying Trends of Auto-Regulation in Severe Head Injury in Paediatrics is a multicentre prospective ethics approved research database study from 10 centres across the UK. Recruitment started in July 2018 with financial support from local/national charities (Action Medical Research for Children, UK). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The first phase of the project is powered to detect optimal thresholds of PRx associated with favourable outcome in PTBI by recruiting 135 patients (initial target of 3 years which has changed to 5 years due to delays related to COVID-19 pandemic) from 10 centres in the UK with outcome follow-up to 1-year postictus. The secondary objectives are to characterise patterns of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in PTBI and compare the fluctuations in these measured parameters with outcome. The goal is to create a comprehensive research database of a basic set of high-resolution (full waveforms resolution) neuromonitoring data in PTBI for scientific use. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Favourable ethical approval has been provided by Health Research Authority, Southwest-Central Bristol Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 18/SW/0053). Results will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed medical journals and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05688462.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , COVID-19 , Adult , Child , Humans , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology , COVID-19/complications , Homeostasis/physiology , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Observational Studies as Topic , Pandemics , Prospective Studies
3.
J Neuroimaging ; 32(1): 104-110, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1769736

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is central to neurocritical care, but not all patients are eligible for invasive ICP-monitoring. A promising noninvasive option is ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). However, meta-analyses of ONSD for elevated ICP show wide confidence intervals. This might be due to baseline variations, inter-rater variability, and varying measurement methods. No standardized protocol has been validated. Corrections for eyeball diameter (ED) and optic nerve diameter (OND) may compensate for baseline variations. We evaluated a protocol and compared two different measurement methods for ONSD ultrasound. METHODS: Two operators, blinded to each other's measurements, measured ONSD, ED, and OND twice in 20 patients. ONSD was measured with two different methods in use: internal (ONSDint) or external (ONSDext) of the dura mater. Intra-class correlation (ICC) was calculated for inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: ICCs for inter-rater reliability of ONSDext and ONSDint (95% confidence interval) were 0.96 (0.93, 0.98) and 0.88 (0.79, 0.94), respectively. ICCs for intra-rater reliability of ONSDext and ONSDint were 0.97 (0.94, 0.99) and 0.93 (0.87, 0.96), respectively. There was no significant bias or difference in intra-rater reliability between operators. CONCLUSIONS: ONSD can be measured with an excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability and low risk of inter-rater bias, when using this protocol. ONSDext yields a higher inter- and intra-rater reliability than ONSDint. Corrections for ED and OND can be performed reliably.


Subject(s)
Intracranial Hypertension , Central Nervous System , Humans , Intracranial Hypertension/diagnostic imaging , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Optic Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography/methods
4.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 28(2): 176-183, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1642421

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We aim to provide the current evidence on utility and application of neuromonitoring tools including electroencephalography (EEG), transcranial Doppler (TCD), pupillometry, optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (cNIRS), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs), and invasive intracranial monitoring in COVID-19. We also provide recent evidence on management strategy of COVID-19-associated neurological complications. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the common occurrence of neurological complications, we found limited use of standard neurologic monitoring in patients with COVID-19. No specific EEG pattern was identified in COVID-19. Frontal epileptic discharge was proposed to be a potential marker of COVID-19 encephalopathy. TCD, ONSD, and pupillometry can provide real-time data on intracranial pressure. Additionally, TCD may be useful for detection of acute large vessel occlusions, abnormal cerebral hemodynamics, cerebral emboli, and evolving cerebral edema at bedside. cNIRS was under-utilized in COVID-19 population and there are ongoing studies to investigate whether cerebral oxygenation could be a more useful parameter than peripheral oxygen saturation to guide clinical titration of permissive hypoxemia. Limited data exists on SSEPs and invasive intracranial monitoring. SUMMARY: Early recognition using standardized neuromonitoring and timely intervention is important to reduce morbidity and mortality. The management strategy for neurological complications is similar to those without COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries , COVID-19 , Humans , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial/methods
5.
J Pediatr ; 233: 263-267, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1176124

ABSTRACT

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is characterized by fever and multiorgan system dysfunction. Neurologic complications of MIS-C are not well described. We present 4 patients with MIS-C who had intracranial hypertension and discuss the unique management considerations when this occurs concurrently with significant myocardial dysfunction.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Intracranial Hypertension/etiology , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/complications , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Female , Humans , Intracranial Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Pandemics , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL